As someone dedicated to ultra near termism, I question the alignment of the author.
This post is suspiciously long and erudite. I am skeptical that this output is consistent with the preferences and abilities (constrained by investment) of an ultra-neartermist.
Is this a good faith effort to garner attention to our cause, or is it an attempt to steer our (minute) resources to other causes?
I’ll now elaborate my concerns, within the necessary constraints:
or its funny to write like that if you feel like it. charles raises a fair point that social reactions to a post are far in the future, but they can be many more than the value of the time you invested. that probably makes more sense for sposts than comments though
As someone dedicated to ultra near termism, I question the alignment of the author.
This post is suspiciously long and erudite. I am skeptical that this output is consistent with the preferences and abilities (constrained by investment) of an ultra-neartermist.
Is this a good faith effort to garner attention to our cause, or is it an attempt to steer our (minute) resources to other causes?
I’ll now elaborate my concerns, within the necessary constraints:
I think that
or its funny to write like that if you feel like it. charles raises a fair point that social reactions to a post are far in the future, but they can be many more than the value of the time you invested. that probably makes more sense for sposts than comments though