Option 1: The EA movement instantly grows to include 1000 new highly-engaged, aligned EAs.
Option 2: X people hear about EA in a relatively high-fidelity way (e.g., through a long-form journalistic article).
...
Responses here also reflected wide variation, spanning several orders of magnitude. The median value was 1 million, implying that gaining 1 highly engaged EA was rated roughly 10,000 times more valuable than introducing one person to EA in a relatively high fidelity way.
Should this be 1,000 times instead? (This also appears at the summary of key results as 10,000)
Minor nitpick
Should this be 1,000 times instead? (This also appears at the summary of key results as 10,000)