Thanks! Makes sense that 80k would only do this for “rated-1o” and “rated-1oo” plan changes.
For cases where it seemed we made a particularly large impact we’ve continued following up for years, in order to update how much impact the plan change had.
Is data about these longer term follow-ups publicly available somewhere? Didn’t see it in my quick read of the 2018 review.
I would expect not, since it would be hard to give much information which isn’t identifiable to individuals. The longer term follow up is factored into our overall impact numbers though, so in that sense it is.
You might be interested in this section though, which says how many plan changes were rated 10 in previous years, but have subsequently been downgraded.
Thanks! Makes sense that 80k would only do this for “rated-1o” and “rated-1oo” plan changes.
Is data about these longer term follow-ups publicly available somewhere? Didn’t see it in my quick read of the 2018 review.
I would expect not, since it would be hard to give much information which isn’t identifiable to individuals. The longer term follow up is factored into our overall impact numbers though, so in that sense it is.
You might be interested in this section though, which says how many plan changes were rated 10 in previous years, but have subsequently been downgraded.
Thanks!
Those are plan changes that have been downgraded after 80k learned more about the situation?