Yeah, I expected as much. Though as per my comment above, I’m much more concerned about representation of thought leaders. A better proxy for intellectual diversity is something like “are the few people from each of these clusters who are the biggest critics of the consensus view invited?” E.g. for the Pause AI cluster that’d probably be Holly; for the MIRI cluster that’d probably be Yudkowsky and Habryka; for the academic ML cluster that’d probably be Dan Hendrycks; for the sociopolitical safety cluster that’d probably be Ben Hoffman and Michael Vassar.
I don’t know exactly who was invited but I expect that the Summit gets a medium score on this metric: not great, not terrible.
In case it’s helpful: as an attendee of this event I would say ~2.5 of these 5 were like “decently” represented (not saying that’s sufficient)
Yeah, I expected as much. Though as per my comment above, I’m much more concerned about representation of thought leaders. A better proxy for intellectual diversity is something like “are the few people from each of these clusters who are the biggest critics of the consensus view invited?” E.g. for the Pause AI cluster that’d probably be Holly; for the MIRI cluster that’d probably be Yudkowsky and Habryka; for the academic ML cluster that’d probably be Dan Hendrycks; for the sociopolitical safety cluster that’d probably be Ben Hoffman and Michael Vassar.
I don’t know exactly who was invited but I expect that the Summit gets a medium score on this metric: not great, not terrible.