I am grateful for your considerate comment and your reply. I had no belief or thought about dishonesty.
Maybe I should have added[1]:
“this is for onlookers”
“this is trying to rationalize/explain why this post exists, that has 234 karma and 156 votes, yet only talks about high school stuff.”
I posted my comment because this situation is hurting onlookers and producing bycatch?
I don’t really know what to do here (as a communications thing) and I have incentives not to be involved?
But this is sort of getting into the elliptical rhetoric and self-referential stuff, that is sort of related to the problem in the first place.
I am grateful for your considerate comment and your reply. I had no belief or thought about dishonesty.
Maybe I should have added[1]:
“this is for onlookers”
“this is trying to rationalize/explain why this post exists, that has 234 karma and 156 votes, yet only talks about high school stuff.”
I posted my comment because this situation is hurting onlookers and producing bycatch?
I don’t really know what to do here (as a communications thing) and I have incentives not to be involved?
But this is sort of getting into the elliptical rhetoric and self-referential stuff, that is sort of related to the problem in the first place.