For all I know, you maybe right or not (insofar as I follow what’s being insinuated), but whilst I freely admit that l, like anyone who wants to work in EA, have self-interested incentives to not be too critical of Eliezer, there is no specific secret “latent issue” that I personally am aware of and consciously avoiding talking about. Honest.
For all I know, you maybe right or not (insofar as I follow what’s being insinuated), but whilst I freely admit that l, like anyone who wants to work in EA, have self-interested incentives to not be too critical of Eliezer, there is no specific secret “latent issue” that I personally am aware of and consciously avoiding talking about. Honest.
I am grateful for your considerate comment and your reply. I had no belief or thought about dishonesty.
Maybe I should have added[1]:
“this is for onlookers”
“this is trying to rationalize/explain why this post exists, that has 234 karma and 156 votes, yet only talks about high school stuff.”
I posted my comment because this situation is hurting onlookers and producing bycatch?
I don’t really know what to do here (as a communications thing) and I have incentives not to be involved?
But this is sort of getting into the elliptical rhetoric and self-referential stuff, that is sort of related to the problem in the first place.