I think it would be better if agree/âdisagree voting didnât follow the typical karma rules where different users have different amounts of karma. As it stands I often donât know how many people expressed agreement vs. disagreement, which feels like the information I actually want, and it doesnât make intuitive sense that one forum user might be able to âagree twice as muchâ as another with a comment.
Thanks for the feedback. The tradeoff I see is that it could be valuable for folks to be able to express a strong vs weak opinion. Perhaps what we need is to give a better breakdown of how the votes went?
I think it would be better if agree/âdisagree voting didnât follow the typical karma rules where different users have different amounts of karma. As it stands I often donât know how many people expressed agreement vs. disagreement, which feels like the information I actually want, and it doesnât make intuitive sense that one forum user might be able to âagree twice as muchâ as another with a comment.
Thanks for the feedback. The tradeoff I see is that it could be valuable for folks to be able to express a strong vs weak opinion. Perhaps what we need is to give a better breakdown of how the votes went?