I think it would be better if agree/disagree voting didn’t follow the typical karma rules where different users have different amounts of karma. As it stands I often don’t know how many people expressed agreement vs. disagreement, which feels like the information I actually want, and it doesn’t make intuitive sense that one forum user might be able to “agree twice as much” as another with a comment.
Thanks for the feedback. The tradeoff I see is that it could be valuable for folks to be able to express a strong vs weak opinion. Perhaps what we need is to give a better breakdown of how the votes went?
I think it would be better if agree/disagree voting didn’t follow the typical karma rules where different users have different amounts of karma. As it stands I often don’t know how many people expressed agreement vs. disagreement, which feels like the information I actually want, and it doesn’t make intuitive sense that one forum user might be able to “agree twice as much” as another with a comment.
Thanks for the feedback. The tradeoff I see is that it could be valuable for folks to be able to express a strong vs weak opinion. Perhaps what we need is to give a better breakdown of how the votes went?