To be clear, this is a regular post that be edited by anyone. So it’s quite unlike the EA Forum Wiki.
I could see that it would be better to have another name for what you’re suggesting than “wiki posts”, since there is a risk of conflation between that and the EA Forum wiki articles.
Yeah, that’s a plausible candidate. Or something else in that ballpark. Though I guess you want to distinguish them from posts that are co-authored in the standard way.
That’s an interesting suggestion. I guess one objection could be that there is a risk of conflation with the community tag. Otoh, I guess that almost any term you could reasonably use is used for something else as well, so I’m unsure how much weight to put on that. It seems like less of an issue than it is regarding the term “Wiki”.
To be clear, this is a regular post that be edited by anyone. So it’s quite unlike the EA Forum Wiki.
I could see that it would be better to have another name for what you’re suggesting than “wiki posts”, since there is a risk of conflation between that and the EA Forum wiki articles.
What would you suggest? Collaborative posts?
Yeah, that’s a plausible candidate. Or something else in that ballpark. Though I guess you want to distinguish them from posts that are co-authored in the standard way.
Better?
Haha, you’re implementing your own system. :)
That’s an interesting suggestion. I guess one objection could be that there is a risk of conflation with the community tag. Otoh, I guess that almost any term you could reasonably use is used for something else as well, so I’m unsure how much weight to put on that. It seems like less of an issue than it is regarding the term “Wiki”.
Alternatively, wiki pages could have karma and be creatable by anyone. That would solve the problem too.
“Open posts” perhaps?