Maybe a good compromise would be to publish a complete list generated from relevant fields in the grants database every couple of months (redacting recipients who requested not to have their grant publicized), and then we’d all have an opportunity to ask for elaboration or other questions in the comments each time. This way the time invested in providing (the equivalent of) “reports” on each grant would be better targeted toward the cases that the community is most interested in/uncertain about, which should be a small minority of the grants made.
Maybe a good compromise would be to publish a complete list generated from relevant fields in the grants database every couple of months (redacting recipients who requested not to have their grant publicized), and then we’d all have an opportunity to ask for elaboration or other questions in the comments each time. This way the time invested in providing (the equivalent of) “reports” on each grant would be better targeted toward the cases that the community is most interested in/uncertain about, which should be a small minority of the grants made.