Yes, exactly. When first reading your summary i interpreted it as the “for all” claim.
Ok, thanks, I now say “Prove that a certain nonrandom, non-Bayesian …”.
Current theme: default
Less Wrong (text)
Less Wrong (link)
Yes, exactly. When first reading your summary i interpreted it as the “for all” claim.
Ok, thanks, I now say “Prove that a certain nonrandom, non-Bayesian …”.