I liked the transcript, much easier to skim and skip around than a video. At different points in my life/career I would have liked the video more—having both seems like an accessibility win.
I liked that this is organized—the table-of-contents is a great way to explore and jump around.
I wish there was some summary of key points or takeaways. It seems like that could have gone with or in place of the sections overview at the top. It seems like a bunch of care/preparation went into having good questions, so I think here I’d have a lot of trust in the interviewer’s brief.
Also I think it would be more skim-able if there were clearer typographic indications of who is speaking what paragraph. Not exactly sure how to do it on the AF site, but having each speaker highlighted in a slightly different color, or indentation, or something like that. Right now my assumption is that there isn’t a great way to do that on this site.
It seems like a bunch of care/preparation went into having good questions, so I think here I’d have a lot of trust in the interviewer’s brief.
Just fli—in this case, we spent some time in the beginning making a very rough outline of what would be good to talk about. Much of this is stuff Eli put forward. I’ve also known Eli for a while, so had a lot of context going in.
I liked the transcript, much easier to skim and skip around than a video. At different points in my life/career I would have liked the video more—having both seems like an accessibility win.
I liked that this is organized—the table-of-contents is a great way to explore and jump around.
I wish there was some summary of key points or takeaways. It seems like that could have gone with or in place of the sections overview at the top. It seems like a bunch of care/preparation went into having good questions, so I think here I’d have a lot of trust in the interviewer’s brief.
Also I think it would be more skim-able if there were clearer typographic indications of who is speaking what paragraph. Not exactly sure how to do it on the AF site, but having each speaker highlighted in a slightly different color, or indentation, or something like that. Right now my assumption is that there isn’t a great way to do that on this site.
Just fli—in this case, we spent some time in the beginning making a very rough outline of what would be good to talk about. Much of this is stuff Eli put forward. I’ve also known Eli for a while, so had a lot of context going in.