I’d be open to Singeria requesting a further extension based on specific personnel reasons, such as previously planned vacation or illness of a key employee, or particularly significant program commitments (e.g., a key employee is testifying before a national legislature or meeting with a key processor executive soon).
I would apply a lower bar for an extension request than this in most cases. Here, I think VettedCauses does have a moderately significant, case-specific reason to push for promptness—the effect of Singeria’s response to VC’s review on VC’s reputation. That interest is presumably of little importance to Singeria, so it is less likely to weigh it very much in deciding how much time to request.
I think so.
I’d be open to Singeria requesting a further extension based on specific personnel reasons, such as previously planned vacation or illness of a key employee, or particularly significant program commitments (e.g., a key employee is testifying before a national legislature or meeting with a key processor executive soon).
I would apply a lower bar for an extension request than this in most cases. Here, I think VettedCauses does have a moderately significant, case-specific reason to push for promptness—the effect of Singeria’s response to VC’s review on VC’s reputation. That interest is presumably of little importance to Singeria, so it is less likely to weigh it very much in deciding how much time to request.