Anecdotal, but: Facebook is the reason Iām married and has been, I think, enormously valuable to me as a way to connect with people in my life (relative to spending the same amount of time reading or playing video games or trying some much less efficient way of keeping up with people). I expect Iād be much lonelier without it.
Non-anecdotally, willingness-to-pay data for Facebook seems to indicate that people find it valuable (though you could argue that they are wrong in some way, if you want to e.g. make a Facebook/āsmoking analogy).
Overall, I suspect that Facebook (like most social networks) creates obvious harm for some users, and non-obvious benefit for many users*, leading people to see it as a more negative entity than it actually is.
*Not just extreme cases like mine ā my parents, for example, mostly use Facebook to keep up with old friends and extended family, and it seems like a much better way to do this than e.g. trying to do regular phone calls with all of those people. I expect this use case is really common.
Thatās interesting. My sense is that most people I know who use facebook view it as a compulsive time sink. I look back and think that probably 99% of the time I used to spend on it was wasted and that I am much better off having deactivated my account. I donāt feel I have lost anything in terms of keeping in touch with people from not being on thereāpeople can email me, call me or whatsapp me fairly easily if they want to get in touch. People I know who have left it are happy to have done so and regret not doing it earlier.
Yeah I donāt think the willingness to pay argument works because my claim is that itās like compulsive gamblingāpeopleās willingness to spend time on it isnāt a sign that it is valuable. I do find it a bit of a grim view of human potential for fulfilment that the value of a business is that it aspires to do something that is very arguably marginally better than watching TV or playing video games.
Iām surprised to hear that so many people you speak with feel that way. My experience of using Facebook (with an ad blocker) is that itās a mix of interesting thinkposts from friends in EA or other academic circles + personal news from people I care about, but would be unlikely to proactively keep in touch with (extended family, people I knew in college, etc.).
I certainly scroll past my fair share of posts, but the average quality of things I see on FB is easily competitive with what I see on Twitter (and I curate my Twitter carefully, so this is praise).
As a random sample, when I open Facebook now, the posts I see are:
A question in an EA group about making wills (Iād have answered it if someone else hadnāt already, and Iām glad that my friends in the group are seeing that post)
A cute, nerdy parenting anecdote from Scott Aaronson
A nice personal update with a lovely photo from an acquaintance (scroll past, but happy to see heās well)
An irrelevant update from a page I followed in high school ā I unfollowed it immediately and wonāt ever see it again
A post from Ozzie Gooen on Zviās recent SFF grant writeup (I happened to know about this already, but if I didnāt, Iād be really glad I saw his post)
An amusing Twitter screenshot
A post from a friend about her recent sobriety and the journey she took to get there (I hadnāt been aware of her struggles, but this is someone I really like; I read her story with interest and came away feeling hopeful)
I wonder whether FB looks different for people who see it as a time sink, or if they just have a higher bar for āgood use of idle timeā than I do.
Also anecdotally I have found Facebook quite positive since I installed a feed blocker. Now I just get event invites, notifications from groups Iām interested (which are much easier to curate than a feed), a low-overhead messaging service, and the ability to maintain shallow but genuinely friendly relationships and occasionally crowdsource from a peer group in more helpful ways than Google.
Overall Iād say itās comfortably though not dramatically net positive like thisāthough given that it involves deliberate hacking out of one of the core components of the service I wouldnāt take it as much of a counterpoint to āFacebook is generally badā.
Anecdotal, but: Facebook is the reason Iām married and has been, I think, enormously valuable to me as a way to connect with people in my life (relative to spending the same amount of time reading or playing video games or trying some much less efficient way of keeping up with people). I expect Iād be much lonelier without it.
Non-anecdotally, willingness-to-pay data for Facebook seems to indicate that people find it valuable (though you could argue that they are wrong in some way, if you want to e.g. make a Facebook/āsmoking analogy).
Overall, I suspect that Facebook (like most social networks) creates obvious harm for some users, and non-obvious benefit for many users*, leading people to see it as a more negative entity than it actually is.
*Not just extreme cases like mine ā my parents, for example, mostly use Facebook to keep up with old friends and extended family, and it seems like a much better way to do this than e.g. trying to do regular phone calls with all of those people. I expect this use case is really common.
Thatās interesting. My sense is that most people I know who use facebook view it as a compulsive time sink. I look back and think that probably 99% of the time I used to spend on it was wasted and that I am much better off having deactivated my account. I donāt feel I have lost anything in terms of keeping in touch with people from not being on thereāpeople can email me, call me or whatsapp me fairly easily if they want to get in touch. People I know who have left it are happy to have done so and regret not doing it earlier.
Yeah I donāt think the willingness to pay argument works because my claim is that itās like compulsive gamblingāpeopleās willingness to spend time on it isnāt a sign that it is valuable. I do find it a bit of a grim view of human potential for fulfilment that the value of a business is that it aspires to do something that is very arguably marginally better than watching TV or playing video games.
Iām surprised to hear that so many people you speak with feel that way. My experience of using Facebook (with an ad blocker) is that itās a mix of interesting thinkposts from friends in EA or other academic circles + personal news from people I care about, but would be unlikely to proactively keep in touch with (extended family, people I knew in college, etc.).
I certainly scroll past my fair share of posts, but the average quality of things I see on FB is easily competitive with what I see on Twitter (and I curate my Twitter carefully, so this is praise).
As a random sample, when I open Facebook now, the posts I see are:
A question in an EA group about making wills (Iād have answered it if someone else hadnāt already, and Iām glad that my friends in the group are seeing that post)
A cute, nerdy parenting anecdote from Scott Aaronson
A nice personal update with a lovely photo from an acquaintance (scroll past, but happy to see heās well)
An irrelevant update from a page I followed in high school ā I unfollowed it immediately and wonāt ever see it again
A post from Ozzie Gooen on Zviās recent SFF grant writeup (I happened to know about this already, but if I didnāt, Iād be really glad I saw his post)
An amusing Twitter screenshot
A post from a friend about her recent sobriety and the journey she took to get there (I hadnāt been aware of her struggles, but this is someone I really like; I read her story with interest and came away feeling hopeful)
I wonder whether FB looks different for people who see it as a time sink, or if they just have a higher bar for āgood use of idle timeā than I do.
Also anecdotally I have found Facebook quite positive since I installed a feed blocker. Now I just get event invites, notifications from groups Iām interested (which are much easier to curate than a feed), a low-overhead messaging service, and the ability to maintain shallow but genuinely friendly relationships and occasionally crowdsource from a peer group in more helpful ways than Google.
Overall Iād say itās comfortably though not dramatically net positive like thisāthough given that it involves deliberate hacking out of one of the core components of the service I wouldnāt take it as much of a counterpoint to āFacebook is generally badā.