This is a really complex question, and I canāt give any kind of comprehensive answer. Some thoughts you mind find relevant:
It isnāt too difficult to learn the basics of economics, and doing so will give you many more options as a scholar in the future (whatever field you end up in). While you didnāt mention wanting to get a PhD, I think some of 80,000 Hoursā thoughts on the benefits of an econ PhD could still apply here.
Iād be surprised if there were many jobs that would accept you if you had a degree in Environmental Policy, but not if you had one in Environmental Economics (or vice-versa). Iād expect these fields to overlap enough that you could use either one as a springboard to a job (as long as you know what kinds of jobs you want in advance, and choose your classes/āresearch areas accordingly).
If youāre looking for an especially high-impact research position, at an organization whose work/āinfluence is very strong, I think itās especially likely that the strength of your CV/āapplication will matter much more than the Masterās program you select (my impression is that effective organizations tend to care more about skills than credentials, relative to less-effective organizations).
As an example, Hauke Hillebrandt has a PhD in neuroscience, but he is among the most influential members of the EA community as far as promoting climate change as a cause area. (This recent article about his work got a lot of attention.)
You could also look at the organizations the Open Philanthropy Project has funded to work on climate change, or those they cite in their write-ups on the topic (pretty easy to find if you use their Grants database or Google terms like āOpen Phil climate changeā). Iād guess that the people working at those organizations come from many different environmental-science backgrounds (or even unrelated backgrounds).
All in all, Iād recommend choosing the combination of school/āprogram that seems best for you based on whatever variables you care about, including ālocationā and ācostā. Going to a more prestigious school with access to better internships, getting a good scholarship so that money isnāt a concern, being in a physical environment you enjoyā¦ all these factors seem like they would more than make up for any differences between the two types of programs youāre looking at.
I agree to all of your points, and luckily after nearly a decade of working in the media industry I am able to have the combination of school/āprogram thatās best for me. They provide six specializations under the MSc Environmental Sciences program and these are the two Iām most interested about.
The master program is a stepping stone for me to have access to internship and research opportunities I otherwise wouldnāt have. And I plan to take a minor in Environmental Communication or Environmental Education as well. So hopefully I can develop a wider range of skills that will be beneficial to my future career.
This is a really complex question, and I canāt give any kind of comprehensive answer. Some thoughts you mind find relevant:
It isnāt too difficult to learn the basics of economics, and doing so will give you many more options as a scholar in the future (whatever field you end up in). While you didnāt mention wanting to get a PhD, I think some of 80,000 Hoursā thoughts on the benefits of an econ PhD could still apply here.
Iād be surprised if there were many jobs that would accept you if you had a degree in Environmental Policy, but not if you had one in Environmental Economics (or vice-versa). Iād expect these fields to overlap enough that you could use either one as a springboard to a job (as long as you know what kinds of jobs you want in advance, and choose your classes/āresearch areas accordingly).
If youāre looking for an especially high-impact research position, at an organization whose work/āinfluence is very strong, I think itās especially likely that the strength of your CV/āapplication will matter much more than the Masterās program you select (my impression is that effective organizations tend to care more about skills than credentials, relative to less-effective organizations).
As an example, Hauke Hillebrandt has a PhD in neuroscience, but he is among the most influential members of the EA community as far as promoting climate change as a cause area. (This recent article about his work got a lot of attention.)
You could also look at the organizations the Open Philanthropy Project has funded to work on climate change, or those they cite in their write-ups on the topic (pretty easy to find if you use their Grants database or Google terms like āOpen Phil climate changeā). Iād guess that the people working at those organizations come from many different environmental-science backgrounds (or even unrelated backgrounds).
All in all, Iād recommend choosing the combination of school/āprogram that seems best for you based on whatever variables you care about, including ālocationā and ācostā. Going to a more prestigious school with access to better internships, getting a good scholarship so that money isnāt a concern, being in a physical environment you enjoyā¦ all these factors seem like they would more than make up for any differences between the two types of programs youāre looking at.
Thanks a lot for your reply, it is very helpful.
I agree to all of your points, and luckily after nearly a decade of working in the media industry I am able to have the combination of school/āprogram thatās best for me. They provide six specializations under the MSc Environmental Sciences program and these are the two Iām most interested about.
The master program is a stepping stone for me to have access to internship and research opportunities I otherwise wouldnāt have. And I plan to take a minor in Environmental Communication or Environmental Education as well. So hopefully I can develop a wider range of skills that will be beneficial to my future career.