Thanks, Dave! Yes, we found that even the conservative estimate indicates that this can be a worthwhile investment and I feel more robustly good about folks investing in experimenting with high-quality services. That said, some initiatives have significantly higher ROI than 3.7 (our upper bound) so people will have to make individual judgment calls.
In terms of your considerations:
This seems right to me. I also want to stress that I think it’s likely that some of the people who could benefit the most from these services aren’t currently working at organizations. E.g., individual researchers who don’t have anything that resembles management and other beneficial structures typically found within organizations.
Seems true to me! However, even very senior people may benefit a lot from this. For example, many of the big tech CEOs (e.g., Eric Schmidt, Tim Cook, and Sundar Pichai) were coached by Bill Campbell and attributed significant value to that coaching.
Thanks, Dave! Yes, we found that even the conservative estimate indicates that this can be a worthwhile investment and I feel more robustly good about folks investing in experimenting with high-quality services. That said, some initiatives have significantly higher ROI than 3.7 (our upper bound) so people will have to make individual judgment calls.
In terms of your considerations:
This seems right to me. I also want to stress that I think it’s likely that some of the people who could benefit the most from these services aren’t currently working at organizations. E.g., individual researchers who don’t have anything that resembles management and other beneficial structures typically found within organizations.
Seems true to me! However, even very senior people may benefit a lot from this. For example, many of the big tech CEOs (e.g., Eric Schmidt, Tim Cook, and Sundar Pichai) were coached by Bill Campbell and attributed significant value to that coaching.
Yes, we’re happy to support follow-ups!