Thank you very much for your words Vasco! And thank you for catching those formatting typos, I’ve corrected them now.
In order:
Two underscores seemed to have got lost in translation to markdown! Should be there now.
You’re right to point out that, in this context,r(0)=r0−r∞≈r0 but it isn’t exactly r0. I was using that approximation for the exposition but should have made that clearer, especially in the code. I’ve made minor corrections to reflect this.
I’ll also improve the phrasing to make the sentence you mentioned on f=0.0001 clearer.
Thank you very much for your words Vasco! And thank you for catching those formatting typos, I’ve corrected them now.
In order:
Two underscores seemed to have got lost in translation to markdown! Should be there now.
You’re right to point out that, in this context,r(0)=r0−r∞≈r0 but it isn’t exactly r0. I was using that approximation for the exposition but should have made that clearer, especially in the code. I’ve made minor corrections to reflect this.
I’ll also improve the phrasing to make the sentence you mentioned on f=0.0001 clearer.
Thanks again!