I was a bit confused at first as to why you would use “on” rather than “for” in the name, since “for” seems more standard, but “Center for Long-Term Risk” could sound like you’re promoting risk, and “Center for Long-Term Risk [X]” where X=”Research”, “Reduction”, “Mitigation”, etc., is kind of long.
I think the name is a good choice, and the reasoning for it makes sense to me.
I was a bit confused at first as to why you would use “on” rather than “for” in the name, since “for” seems more standard, but “Center for Long-Term Risk” could sound like you’re promoting risk, and “Center for Long-Term Risk [X]” where X=”Research”, “Reduction”, “Mitigation”, etc., is kind of long.
I think the name is a good choice, and the reasoning for it makes sense to me.
I went through the exact same “on” vs “for” thought process myself.
(Also, I’d second the approval of the name change and its reasoning.)