This feels like a good example of how GPT can generate coherent and topic-relevant prose which on a deeper level, doesn’t actually make much sense.
If there are lots of “bidders” wanting to fund something, a charity or research project will normally want to accept funding from all of them, not just a “winner”.
And OpenPhil exists to donate money to causes it believes are most effective and neglected, so picking projects that already have funding secured [in competition with the original funders] seems like a strange way to go about it.
It’s convincing. Couldn’t it be improved or modified? Does this seem like an idea worth completely abandoning? I can’t think of anything at the moment.
This feels like a good example of how GPT can generate coherent and topic-relevant prose which on a deeper level, doesn’t actually make much sense.
If there are lots of “bidders” wanting to fund something, a charity or research project will normally want to accept funding from all of them, not just a “winner”.
And OpenPhil exists to donate money to causes it believes are most effective and neglected, so picking projects that already have funding secured [in competition with the original funders] seems like a strange way to go about it.
It’s convincing. Couldn’t it be improved or modified? Does this seem like an idea worth completely abandoning? I can’t think of anything at the moment.