A lot of existing content from EA Concepts is being used to seed the new Wiki (I didnât mean to give the impression that this wasnât the case). However, some of Pabloâs articles werenât related to EA Concepts articles, and some EA Concepts articles didnât seem like a good fit for the Wiki or have gone obsolete (e.g. articles on various evaluatorsâ charity recommendations from 2017), so not everything made it over.
I wouldnât be surprised if we continued to have additional âfestivalâ events every so often, as a chance for people to look over lots of articles and notice things that needed updating. Aside from that, weâll have me and Pablo continuing to work on this for the foreseeable future, as well as (potentially) one or more other contractors. And I expect the greater prominence of the wiki to bring out a lot of editors naturally â existing tags have already gotten a lot of volunteer contributions, and itâs really helpful to be able to say âyou should throw that in the wiki for [TOPIC]â when someone shares something interesting.
I donât have a great estimate for how much volunteer time weâd need to keep things running, but Iâd expect the bare minimum to be less time than Pablo and I are putting in, such that further volunteer contributions are a nice addition rather than an existential necessity. If we were volunteer-only⌠maybe 15-20 hours per month? Thatâs enough time for a few dozen minor edits plus a couple of substantive new articles.
Iâll answer this question in my reply to your second comment in this thread.
A lot of existing content from EA Concepts is being used to seed the new Wiki (I didnât mean to give the impression that this wasnât the case). However, some of Pabloâs articles werenât related to EA Concepts articles, and some EA Concepts articles didnât seem like a good fit for the Wiki or have gone obsolete (e.g. articles on various evaluatorsâ charity recommendations from 2017), so not everything made it over.
I wouldnât be surprised if we continued to have additional âfestivalâ events every so often, as a chance for people to look over lots of articles and notice things that needed updating. Aside from that, weâll have me and Pablo continuing to work on this for the foreseeable future, as well as (potentially) one or more other contractors. And I expect the greater prominence of the wiki to bring out a lot of editors naturally â existing tags have already gotten a lot of volunteer contributions, and itâs really helpful to be able to say âyou should throw that in the wiki for [TOPIC]â when someone shares something interesting.
I donât have a great estimate for how much volunteer time weâd need to keep things running, but Iâd expect the bare minimum to be less time than Pablo and I are putting in, such that further volunteer contributions are a nice addition rather than an existential necessity. If we were volunteer-only⌠maybe 15-20 hours per month? Thatâs enough time for a few dozen minor edits plus a couple of substantive new articles.
Iâll answer this question in my reply to your second comment in this thread.
Glad to hear the EA Concept content was leveraged!
Iâve consolidate my responses to a few comments including the rest of yours here.