He’s saying that the value of the global cereal market alone is $2tr, which exceeds the value of the wholesale drugs market, contra what you say in your piece.
Okay. So the source I found was probably wrong. I can’t see how this has any significance on the argument, so it would have been more useful to say “this isn’t important for the argument, but just so you know … ”
Sorry, I don’t see what your point is. Could you expand?
He’s saying that the value of the global cereal market alone is $2tr, which exceeds the value of the wholesale drugs market, contra what you say in your piece.
Okay. So the source I found was probably wrong. I can’t see how this has any significance on the argument, so it would have been more useful to say “this isn’t important for the argument, but just so you know … ”
If illicit drugs were greater expenditure than grains, that would be amazing. But I agree, not that important to the argument.