“We plan to visually distinguish between orgs on our top recommended list”: Yay!
“We’ve updated our FAQs”: Please note I don’t think people read your FAQ. We can make another Twitter poll to check this, or (what seems to me like best practice) - watch users browse the site without nudging them to any direction.
“We’re updating the tagline for the job board”—same as point 2: I don’t think this will solve the problem, and I’m afraid that hoping otherwise is what lead to this situation originally.
[see below]
“We plan to add a link to each org’s EA Forum page on our listings”
I endorse this, but it doesn’t solve the problem.
There is no clear place to say “I think this org isn’t impactful / is harmful”, and no clear place to check if anyone said that.
<3
0. Communicating your plans: I endorse this!
“We plan to visually distinguish between orgs on our top recommended list”: Yay!
“We’ve updated our FAQs”: Please note I don’t think people read your FAQ. We can make another Twitter poll to check this, or (what seems to me like best practice) - watch users browse the site without nudging them to any direction.
“We’re updating the tagline for the job board”—same as point 2: I don’t think this will solve the problem, and I’m afraid that hoping otherwise is what lead to this situation originally.
[see below]
“We plan to add a link to each org’s EA Forum page on our listings”
I endorse this, but it doesn’t solve the problem.
There is no clear place to say “I think this org isn’t impactful / is harmful”, and no clear place to check if anyone said that.
What do you think?
Also see this comment.
As I already said, I’m really happy you’re working to improve the situation