Thank you so much for sharing!
I was only confused by this paragraph:
I can’t find anything on his work on preserving sperm for artificial insemination, apparently economically crucial. I worry that is his one negative invention.
Why do you consider this potentially negative?
Seems like it would contribute to the profitability and feasibility of factory farming.
That makes sense! I failed to think of non-human applications.
Edit: “economically crucial” should have been a hint.
Thank you so much for sharing!
I was only confused by this paragraph:
Why do you consider this potentially negative?
Seems like it would contribute to the profitability and feasibility of factory farming.
That makes sense! I failed to think of non-human applications.
Edit: “economically crucial” should have been a hint.