Thanks—I largely agree, and am similarly concerned about the potential for such impacts, as was discussed in the thread with John Halstead.
As an aside, I think Harper’s LARB article was being generous in calling Phil’s current affairs article “rather hyperbolic,” and think its tone and substance are an unfortunate distraction from various more reasonable criticisms Phil himself has suggested in the past.
Thanks—I largely agree, and am similarly concerned about the potential for such impacts, as was discussed in the thread with John Halstead.
As an aside, I think Harper’s LARB article was being generous in calling Phil’s current affairs article “rather hyperbolic,” and think its tone and substance are an unfortunate distraction from various more reasonable criticisms Phil himself has suggested in the past.