I will add a section to this paper to clarify this. The argument isn’t that AI is apocalyptic and therefore untrustworthy but that the apocalyptic narratives in AI parrel other apocalyptic narratives that are untrustworthy(specifically old religious narratives). This paper shows that there are narratives within environmentalist circles but that alone isn’t enough for my argument to apply.
I also don’t understand why no one has commented on my reframing of AI risk which I don’t take to be suspect. I very obviously view AI as a threat there’s an entire section on it.
I will add a section to this paper to clarify this. The argument isn’t that AI is apocalyptic and therefore untrustworthy but that the apocalyptic narratives in AI parrel other apocalyptic narratives that are untrustworthy(specifically old religious narratives). This paper shows that there are narratives within environmentalist circles but that alone isn’t enough for my argument to apply.
I also don’t understand why no one has commented on my reframing of AI risk which I don’t take to be suspect. I very obviously view AI as a threat there’s an entire section on it.