I haven’t read the newly published paper, but assuming the results are the same as in the precursor (about the extended very repugnant conclusion), this thread on NU and my other comment here may be of interest.
Thanks!I was going to answer the same as here: the form of the “very repugnant” conclusion applying to NU seems much less repugnant.
I haven’t read the newly published paper, but assuming the results are the same as in the precursor (about the extended very repugnant conclusion), this thread on NU and my other comment here may be of interest.
Thanks!
I was going to answer the same as here: the form of the “very repugnant” conclusion applying to NU seems much less repugnant.