It seems relevant in the same way that the 80,000 Hours replicability quiz is relevant.
Big parts of our institutional knowledge-generating machinery are broken. Knowing which parts & to what extent seems important for cause prioritization and epistemic hygiene.
Also see Open Phil’s science policy & infrastructure cause portfolio.
Also—shameless self-promotion—see Let’s Fund’s Better Science crowdfunding campaign that tries to tackle the replication crisis and make science better.
Current theme: default
Less Wrong (text)
Less Wrong (link)
Arrow keys: Next/previous image
Escape or click: Hide zoomed image
Space bar: Reset image size & position
Scroll to zoom in/out
(When zoomed in, drag to pan; double-click to close)
Keys shown in yellow (e.g., ]) are accesskeys, and require a browser-specific modifier key (or keys).
]
Keys shown in grey (e.g., ?) do not require any modifier keys.
?
Esc
h
f
a
m
v
c
r
q
t
u
o
,
.
/
s
n
e
;
Enter
[
\
k
i
l
=
-
0
′
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
→
↓
←
↑
Space
x
z
`
g
It seems relevant in the same way that the 80,000 Hours replicability quiz is relevant.
Big parts of our institutional knowledge-generating machinery are broken. Knowing which parts & to what extent seems important for cause prioritization and epistemic hygiene.
Also see Open Phil’s science policy & infrastructure cause portfolio.
Also—shameless self-promotion—see Let’s Fund’s Better Science crowdfunding campaign that tries to tackle the replication crisis and make science better.