The calculations suggesting the atmosphere couldn’t ignite were good, but were definitively not beyond reasonable doubt. Fermi and others kept working to re-check the calculations in case they’d missed something all the way up to the day of the test and wouldn’t have done so if they were satisfied by the report.
The report (published after Trinity) does say:
One may conclude that the arguments of this paper make it unreasonable to expect that the N + N reaction could propagate. An unlimited propagation iseven less likely.
That is often quoted by people who want to suggest the case was closed, but the next (and final) sentence of the report says:
However,the complexity of the argument and the absence of satisfactory experimental foundations makes further work on the subject highly desireable.
A small correction:
The calculations suggesting the atmosphere couldn’t ignite were good, but were definitively not beyond reasonable doubt. Fermi and others kept working to re-check the calculations in case they’d missed something all the way up to the day of the test and wouldn’t have done so if they were satisfied by the report.
The report (published after Trinity) does say:
That is often quoted by people who want to suggest the case was closed, but the next (and final) sentence of the report says: