Thanks for the reply Caleb. I’m not arguing it’s not a good fit here (although I disagree with that too, obviously, otherwise I wouldn’t apply to EAIF). Ultimately you guys decide the fit. What I’m arguing is that I felt disrespected by our interactions, and it seems I’m not alone.
I stand by that your feedback contained multiple factual errors. An example is the feedback mentioning we don’t have transparent financials even though all of that was linked clearly (and was even publicly available at that time). Happy to go into other examples but I don’t think we’re going to agree on this.
FWIW I’m happy for you to share public details of our grant application, we’re transparent. I don’t think the public will disagree with you our project is not a fit, because other funders have also declined our Profit for Good ideas so far.
Thanks for the reply Caleb. I’m not arguing it’s not a good fit here (although I disagree with that too, obviously, otherwise I wouldn’t apply to EAIF). Ultimately you guys decide the fit. What I’m arguing is that I felt disrespected by our interactions, and it seems I’m not alone.
I stand by that your feedback contained multiple factual errors. An example is the feedback mentioning we don’t have transparent financials even though all of that was linked clearly (and was even publicly available at that time). Happy to go into other examples but I don’t think we’re going to agree on this.
FWIW I’m happy for you to share public details of our grant application, we’re transparent. I don’t think the public will disagree with you our project is not a fit, because other funders have also declined our Profit for Good ideas so far.