Why do you assume that if a post is AI-written then it’s low-quality? Maybe it’s because you assume that AI is not currently capable of coming up with good ideas/discoveries. I don’t know if that’s true, but even if that’s the case, then I used AI for writing because it was able to convey something in words better and the idea/discovery was made by me. If I write it myself, it wouldn’t be of higher quality (except for the fact that sometimes AI misses some points and it doesn’t represent what I wanted to say perfectly)
Why do you assume that if a post is AI-written then it’s low-quality? Maybe it’s because you assume that AI is not currently capable of coming up with good ideas/discoveries. I don’t know if that’s true, but even if that’s the case, then I used AI for writing because it was able to convey something in words better and the idea/discovery was made by me. If I write it myself, it wouldn’t be of higher quality (except for the fact that sometimes AI misses some points and it doesn’t represent what I wanted to say perfectly)
It’s not an assumption. I read a lot of AI generated text, including on the EA Forum, and so far, it’s low quality.
Okay.