I think that’s a good starting point and I’d encourage people to share if there are good examples. It’s not necessarily a win though even if they can generate high quality argument. I don’t like the sameyness of LLM writing, I much prefer huam thought from the brainsto the page.
I’ve got no problem with AI safety work becoming automated if need be, it’s just the writing for human consumption that I don’t like right now. I suspect I’ll change my mind at some point when LLM writing becomes genuinely indistinguishable from good human writing, because then what can actually be done about it even if there is an objection?
I think something like the EA forum has a decent chance of LLM writing which is OK with people because here substance rules over style, although style is still valued.
I think that’s a good starting point and I’d encourage people to share if there are good examples. It’s not necessarily a win though even if they can generate high quality argument. I don’t like the sameyness of LLM writing, I much prefer huam thought from the brainsto the page.
I’ve got no problem with AI safety work becoming automated if need be, it’s just the writing for human consumption that I don’t like right now. I suspect I’ll change my mind at some point when LLM writing becomes genuinely indistinguishable from good human writing, because then what can actually be done about it even if there is an objection?
I think something like the EA forum has a decent chance of LLM writing which is OK with people because here substance rules over style, although style is still valued.