Personally, I would consider appending “for onlookers”, in this particular instance, as the OP is probably extremely versed in the issues and has a strategy that considers these tradeoffs.
Yeah, I think a more basic look at this would be helpful, and would encourage someone to write an “intro to org theory” post. But in lieu of that, I’ll point out that the issues here relate to incentives in organizations generally, and will point to a preprint paper I wrote that discusses some of the desiderata and strategic considerations in organizations in the context of using metrics, and money based on those metrics, to align people.
This is insightful!
Personally, I would consider appending “for onlookers”, in this particular instance, as the OP is probably extremely versed in the issues and has a strategy that considers these tradeoffs.
Yeah, I think a more basic look at this would be helpful, and would encourage someone to write an “intro to org theory” post. But in lieu of that, I’ll point out that the issues here relate to incentives in organizations generally, and will point to a preprint paper I wrote that discusses some of the desiderata and strategic considerations in organizations in the context of using metrics, and money based on those metrics, to align people.
Yes for sure, it was meant to be a “yes and” to the post, not a criticism of Caroline!