I think Rockwell’s list was a good basis for discussion, and this poll and post can help move that discussion—but a priori consensus is just one (albeit important) criterion for choosing norms. The expected effect from their adoption or rejection is another.
There should probably be some place and time where this can be discussed with more focus. Something akin to a conditional constitutional convention.
Barring autocorrect (see edit to my comment), I imagine it’d be some collection of EAs who have discussion groups for a week or two on specific topics, and at the same time try to reach consensus in the full group on a set of norms.
I think Rockwell’s list was a good basis for discussion, and this poll and post can help move that discussion—but a priori consensus is just one (albeit important) criterion for choosing norms. The expected effect from their adoption or rejection is another.
There should probably be some place and time where this can be discussed with more focus. Something akin to a
conditionalconstitutional convention.What would that convention look like?
Barring autocorrect (see edit to my comment), I imagine it’d be some collection of EAs who have discussion groups for a week or two on specific topics, and at the same time try to reach consensus in the full group on a set of norms.
I think until we choose that group this is a non-awful way of doing that?