Feels a bit weird to me that you are speaking about “EA” doing something here, as it seems pretty clear that this was Will acting in a personal capacity.
(This is in no way trying to defend his actions, but I think it’s an important difference. )
Edit: This comment refered to an earlier version of David’s comment that talked about EA wanting to buy twitter, etc.
Feels a bit weird to me that you are speaking about “EA” doing something here, as it seems pretty clear that this was Will acting in a personal capacity.
(This is in no way trying to defend his actions, but I think it’s an important difference. )
Edit: This comment refered to an earlier version of David’s comment that talked about EA wanting to buy twitter, etc.
I’ve edited the comment now. I agree that Will’s actions are not EA’s actions, and I phrased it weirdly.
I was assuming that any reason Will might have wanted SBF to buy Twitter would be justified in terms of benefit to EA.
So to be clearer, the question to Will would be “Why would it be in the interest of EA for you to facilitate someone close to EA to buy Twitter?”