I’ve edited the comment now. I agree that Will’s actions are not EA’s actions, and I phrased it weirdly.
I was assuming that any reason Will might have wanted SBF to buy Twitter would be justified in terms of benefit to EA.
So to be clearer, the question to Will would be “Why would it be in the interest of EA for you to facilitate someone close to EA to buy Twitter?”
I’ve edited the comment now. I agree that Will’s actions are not EA’s actions, and I phrased it weirdly.
I was assuming that any reason Will might have wanted SBF to buy Twitter would be justified in terms of benefit to EA.
So to be clearer, the question to Will would be “Why would it be in the interest of EA for you to facilitate someone close to EA to buy Twitter?”