Fair point, however, for OP the figure I have is somewhere between 600-700M (depending how you measure it ). Likely close to 650M. In this case I think that >600M is more acurate than ~600M. Similarly for GW its 200-230M.
Thanks, Luke. I see. You are using > 600 M to mean 600 M to 700 M. > 600 M could also mean a value closer to 600 M. So I would use the best guess with more digits to provide more information (for example, 650 M$ for OP, and 220 M$ for GW).
Fair point, however, for OP the figure I have is somewhere between 600-700M (depending how you measure it ). Likely close to 650M. In this case I think that >600M is more acurate than ~600M. Similarly for GW its 200-230M.
Curious if you disagree?
Thanks, Luke. I see. You are using > 600 M to mean 600 M to 700 M. > 600 M could also mean a value closer to 600 M. So I would use the best guess with more digits to provide more information (for example, 650 M$ for OP, and 220 M$ for GW).