Thanks for thisāthis seems a very valuable service, and will inform my donations. (Though itās harder to say what counterfactual influence itāll have, given I was already likely to donate to some of the organisations/āfunders you speak highly of and suggest youāll likely donate to.)
One question/ānit-pick: In the discussion of Zabel & Muehlhauserās post, you write āResearchers from Google Brain were also named authors on the paper.ā Is that accurate? It seems to me that only Zabel & Muehlhauser are listed as authors of that post, and Google Brain itself (as opposed to Google more generally) isnāt mentioned anywhere in the post. (But maybe Iām missing/āmisunderstanding something.)
Thanks for thisāthis seems a very valuable service, and will inform my donations. (Though itās harder to say what counterfactual influence itāll have, given I was already likely to donate to some of the organisations/āfunders you speak highly of and suggest youāll likely donate to.)
One question/ānit-pick: In the discussion of Zabel & Muehlhauserās post, you write āResearchers from Google Brain were also named authors on the paper.ā Is that accurate? It seems to me that only Zabel & Muehlhauser are listed as authors of that post, and Google Brain itself (as opposed to Google more generally) isnāt mentioned anywhere in the post. (But maybe Iām missing/āmisunderstanding something.)