Just to be clear, this is just Wikipedia pageviews?
I suspect they’re telling us something about interest in EA, but I don’t get the sense that the pro-accelerationist MAGA partisans being riled up against EA by the Trump administration are they kind of guys who are going to read the Wiki entry to make sure their hot takes on EA are evidence-based.
Bella—interesting data; thanks for sharing.
Just to be clear, this is just Wikipedia pageviews?
I suspect they’re telling us something about interest in EA, but I don’t get the sense that the pro-accelerationist MAGA partisans being riled up against EA by the Trump administration are they kind of guys who are going to read the Wiki entry to make sure their hot takes on EA are evidence-based.
Yeah just Wikipedia pageviews :)
I agree it’s an imperfect proxy, and might be systematically wrong because of dynamics you describe. But it’s the most accurate proxy I know of!
Bella—thanks for the clarification. Appreciate it!