Do you have specific examples of mistakes you think we’re making, eg (with permission from the applicants) grants we didn’t make that we would if we have shorter 10% timelines, or grants that we made that we shouldn’t?
I don’t know specifics on who has applied to LTFF, but I think you should be funding orgs and people like these:
All of these are new (post-GPT-4): Centre for AI Policy, Artificial Intelligence Policy Institute, PauseAI, Stop AGI, Campaign for AI Safety, Holly Elmore, Safer AI, Stake Out AI.Also, pre-existing: Centre for AI Safety, Future of Life Institute.
(Maybe there is a bottleneck on applications too.)
Current theme: default
Less Wrong (text)
Less Wrong (link)
Arrow keys: Next/previous image
Escape or click: Hide zoomed image
Space bar: Reset image size & position
Scroll to zoom in/out
(When zoomed in, drag to pan; double-click to close)
Keys shown in yellow (e.g., ]) are accesskeys, and require a browser-specific modifier key (or keys).
]
Keys shown in grey (e.g., ?) do not require any modifier keys.
?
Esc
h
f
a
m
v
c
r
q
t
u
o
,
.
/
s
n
e
;
Enter
[
\
k
i
l
=
-
0
′
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
→
↓
←
↑
Space
x
z
`
g
Do you have specific examples of mistakes you think we’re making, eg (with permission from the applicants) grants we didn’t make that we would if we have shorter 10% timelines, or grants that we made that we shouldn’t?
I don’t know specifics on who has applied to LTFF, but I think you should be funding orgs and people like these:
(Maybe there is a bottleneck on applications too.)