The page has now been updated. I added the following caveat:
Note that some of the funding described here has gone toward the charities described above. This means that certain “impacts” on this page may appear twice — for example, grants from Open Philanthropy help to fund GiveDirectly’s work. We discuss both the work and the funding to provide a more complete picture of the movement, but we caution you not to count the impact twice.
Given that I expect this page to keep including examples of fundraising success and actions by charities, and to add more examples of both over time, I think a caveat is better than trying to avoid ever featuring a grant and its outcome at the same time.
(One could argue that the actions are more important to discuss than the funding, but I think the funding numbers provide a sense of EA’s overall scale that doesn’t appear if you just look at a sample of charities.)
The page has now been updated. I added the following caveat:
Note that some of the funding described here has gone toward the charities described above. This means that certain “impacts” on this page may appear twice — for example, grants from Open Philanthropy help to fund GiveDirectly’s work. We discuss both the work and the funding to provide a more complete picture of the movement, but we caution you not to count the impact twice.
Given that I expect this page to keep including examples of fundraising success and actions by charities, and to add more examples of both over time, I think a caveat is better than trying to avoid ever featuring a grant and its outcome at the same time.
(One could argue that the actions are more important to discuss than the funding, but I think the funding numbers provide a sense of EA’s overall scale that doesn’t appear if you just look at a sample of charities.)
This looks like a great solution! FYI I don’t see it up yet, maybe it hasn’t been deployed or something.
Maybe you’re not looking at the right section? It’s been here:
My mistake! You’re right, I see it now.