taking the Rethink Priorities 7 − 15% numbers at face value, when the arguments for those AFAICT don’t even have particular models behind them. This is a pretty crazy sounding number that needs way better argumentation than “a poll of people said so”, and here it’s just asserted without much commentary at all.
I’m confused by this statement. The welfare range estimates aren’t based on a “poll” and are based on numerous “particular models.”
I’m confused by this statement. The welfare range estimates aren’t based on a “poll” and are based on numerous “particular models.”