Lamentably I am unable to tell you what I think of your comments without breaking the site’s TOS, so instead I will offer that, if I WERE to respond to the substance of what you’ve written, my focus would be upon your reasoning skills and ability to parse empirical evidence :)
I’m a charitable woman, so I won’t mention your spelling—except to note that in the context of this attempt to flex your intellectual bona fides, “congitive equivlanet” is delicious. Have a lovely day.
Lamentably I am unable to tell you what I think of your comments without breaking the site’s TOS, so instead I will offer that, if I WERE to respond to the substance of what you’ve written, my focus would be upon your reasoning skills and ability to parse empirical evidence :)
I’m a charitable woman, so I won’t mention your spelling—except to note that in the context of this attempt to flex your intellectual bona fides, “congitive equivlanet” is delicious. Have a lovely day.