Obviously the answer to this will vary for different people, and obviously each individual EA should spend at least some time engaging with members of both of those very broad categories of people. But it still seems useful to ask questions like:
In general, how much time should EAs spend engaging with other EAs vs with non-EAs?
How does the amount of time EAs should spend engaging with other EAs vs with non-EAs differ based on various conditions?
E.g., whether we’re asking what a more vs less engaged EA should do, whether we’re asking what a budding researcher vs budding policymaker should do, and whether this engagement in intended for social purposes vs gaining knowledge vs forming connections
What are the main factors driving answers to those questions?
I’ve seen various interesting discussions of these sorts of questions, and thought it’d be useful to have one post which collects together (a) a bunch of links to prior statements on this and (b) new statements on this. So please answer with either links, your own views, or both. (I’ll provide some links and views in an answer myself.)
Meta comments which you can skip:
The catalyst for me making this post was Richard Ngo recently writing that he feels he “should have engaged more with people outside the EA community” in prior years.
I’m not sure precisely what the best way of formulating these questions are, and whether various other questions should be included in the scope of this.
In particular, this cluster of questions seems hard to fully separate from questions about how often and under what conditions EAs should work at EA vs non-EA orgs. But that’s a big topic in its own right, and maybe it’d be worth having a separate post collecting links and views on that.
For now, I suggest erring towards inclusion of things that seem potentially relevant.
Feel free to make suggestions about subquestions, related questions, the scope, etc.
I am not trying to imply that EAs should try to explicitly “optimise” their free time and social lives, that they should treat all interactions with other people in a naively consequentialist or instrumentalising way, or that there’ll be simple and widely applicable answers to how much EAs should engage with other EAs vs non-EAs
But there may be some general heuristics, some heuristics relevant to certain subsets of people/situations, some caveats to those heuristics, etc.
Some factors that could influence answers to this cluster of questions:
(This is just a very quick, non-exhaustive list, with very little commentary. I’m hoping other people can add a bunch more factors, commentary, etc.)
Concerns about value drift
The value of bringing people who are currently outside of EA into the EA movement
The value of introducing people who are (and might remain) outside of EA to EA ideas
The post Community vs Network feels somewhat relevant here
The value of getting a diversity of views
The post Community vs Network feels somewhat relevant here too
How much a person should be focused on working at EA vs non-EA orgs
There are various ways this could be relevant
One is that, if one is more focused on working at non-EA orgs, that might increase the value of building strong networks in specific communities outside of EA (e.g., in specific policy or academic communities).
Specific things to do with personal preferences and circumstances
Thank you for starting a thread on this open question! Just reading through.
I wrote some quick thoughts on the value of getting a diversity of views here.
Some prior statements/discussion of this cluster of questions:
As noted, a recent post by Richard Ngo argued that he should’ve engaged more with people outside the EA community in prior years
Daniel Kokatajlo commented on that same post saying that the opposite seems true for Daniel
I think this post was relevant: Objections to Value-Alignment between Effective Altruists
I seem to recall there being relevant parts of the 80,000 Hours anonymous answers series
I just very quickly skimmed through those posts again, and this post definitely has relevant parts, while the following also seem decently likely to:
https://80000hours.org/2020/04/anonymous-answers-diversity/
https://80000hours.org/2020/02/anonymous-answers-effective-altruism-community-and-growth/
https://80000hours.org/2019/11/anonymous-answers-most-overrated/
https://80000hours.org/2020/02/anonymous-answers-general-life-advice/
https://80000hours.org/2020/02/anonymous-answers-flaws-80000hours/
https://80000hours.org/2020/06/anonymous-answers-myths-and-other-questions/
(I’m sure there are many other relevant links that have slipped my mind or that I never saw, which is why this is a question post rather than just a post!)
Some related questions:
How much should EAs focus on working at EA orgs vs at other orgs?
And how does this vary based on various aspects of the individual/situation in question? And what are the factors driving answers to these questions?
We could also ask about working in roles explicitly in vs not explicitly in the EA community, if we wanted to also capture independent work, founding new orgs, etc.
Prior discussion:
There’s a lot, and I haven’t taken the time to compile it here
One recent discussion occurred in this post and some of the comments on it: My mistakes on the path to impact
How much time should EAs spend consuming content (e.g., papers, articles, podcasts) created by EAs vs content not created by EAs?
I assume this has been discussed before in various places, though I can’t immediately recall where
(Presumably many other questions could also be mentioned.)