Just want to say that I like it when people (a) try to create nice, quick summaries that can be sent to people or linked to in other things,[1] and (b) take a quite iterative approach to posting on the forum, where the author continues to solicit feedback and make edits even after posting.
On (b), I’ve often appreciated input on my posts from commenters on the EA Forum and LessWrong, and felt that it helped me improve posts in ways that I likely wouldn’t have thought of if I’d just sat on the post for a few more weeks, trying to think of more improvements myself. (Though obviously it’s also possible to get some of this before posting, via sharing Google Docs.)
[1] EA Concepts already partly serves this role, and is great, but there are concepts it doesn’t cover, and those that it does cover it covers very briefly and in a slightly out-of-date way.
Just want to say that I like it when people (a) try to create nice, quick summaries that can be sent to people or linked to in other things,[1] and (b) take a quite iterative approach to posting on the forum, where the author continues to solicit feedback and make edits even after posting.
On (b), I’ve often appreciated input on my posts from commenters on the EA Forum and LessWrong, and felt that it helped me improve posts in ways that I likely wouldn’t have thought of if I’d just sat on the post for a few more weeks, trying to think of more improvements myself. (Though obviously it’s also possible to get some of this before posting, via sharing Google Docs.)
[1] EA Concepts already partly serves this role, and is great, but there are concepts it doesn’t cover, and those that it does cover it covers very briefly and in a slightly out-of-date way.