In principle any topic is worthy of further study. However, given the cost of information processing and amount of biased noise written on the topic by the likes of Charles Murray, I would need studies far stronger than ones done on interpolated national IQ values to update my beliefs about the topic’s importance.
What have you read from Murray that you found biased? What views do you think he holds that are out of line with mainstream opinion of intelligence researchers?
In principle any topic is worthy of further study. However, given the cost of information processing and amount of biased noise written on the topic by the likes of Charles Murray, I would need studies far stronger than ones done on interpolated national IQ values to update my beliefs about the topic’s importance.
What have you read from Murray that you found biased? What views do you think he holds that are out of line with mainstream opinion of intelligence researchers?