Yeah that all seems plausible to me! I think your argument here should successfully deflate a lot of the motivation deontologists should have in advocating against consequentialism, especially if they concede (which many seem to) that consequentialists don’t tend to act like naive consequentialists.
Of course, some philosophers may just like talking about which theory they think is true, regardless of whether their theory would imply that they should do that. :)
Yeah that all seems plausible to me! I think your argument here should successfully deflate a lot of the motivation deontologists should have in advocating against consequentialism, especially if they concede (which many seem to) that consequentialists don’t tend to act like naive consequentialists.
Of course, some philosophers may just like talking about which theory they think is true, regardless of whether their theory would imply that they should do that. :)