And let’s not gloss over this, right. His concession is a knockdown argument to the overall thesis.
If AI means I can’t eat, but can still work, I cannot eat. Game over is much more likely.
I do not think the concession matters much. I ultimately care about expected changes in welfare, not whether something is possible.
And let’s not gloss over this, right. His concession is a knockdown argument to the overall thesis.
If AI means I can’t eat, but can still work, I cannot eat. Game over is much more likely.
I do not think the concession matters much. I ultimately care about expected changes in welfare, not whether something is possible.