If you PM me I’m happy to send you the list. Like I said in the post, I don’t believe it would be productive to post it publicly.
I think this is a wise decision, and I disagree with those claiming that publicly criticising grant receipts is a good idea.
I think I want to take the side of “public criticisms are good.” I think past examples in this genre (e.g. the Larks’ AI alignment Literature Review and Charity Comparison and Nuño’s 2018-2019 LTFF Grantees: How did they do?) were substantially net positive.
If you PM me I’m happy to send you the list. Like I said in the post, I don’t believe it would be productive to post it publicly.
I think this is a wise decision, and I disagree with those claiming that publicly criticising grant receipts is a good idea.
I think I want to take the side of “public criticisms are good.” I think past examples in this genre (e.g. the Larks’ AI alignment Literature Review and Charity Comparison and Nuño’s 2018-2019 LTFF Grantees: How did they do?) were substantially net positive.