This is an exciting initiative and this results post is very useful and informative – congrats and thanks for sharing! I’m curious about:
were outright spam.
How many % were spam? Depending on the volume, I’d be surprised (if it’s >5%). I’m also curious about what spam entries looked like: did they mock any specific GCR (e.g., climate change, AI), or were just nonsensical?
This is an exciting initiative and this results post is very useful and informative – congrats and thanks for sharing! I’m curious about:
How many % were spam? Depending on the volume, I’d be surprised (if it’s >5%). I’m also curious about what spam entries looked like: did they mock any specific GCR (e.g., climate change, AI), or were just nonsensical?
I didn’t keep good track of them, but like ~5 of them were spam.
They included some bizarre texts like someone who wanted to sell us a new “discovery” of a medicine and two people self promoting.
The funniest one is one titled “mega-earthquakes” that talked about… you guessed it, the Christian apocalypse.