So, are we going to talk about the awesome aesthetic design, like the five dimensional meta flower?
Can you write about the design choices and who did this work?
Is Aaron Gertler secretly this generation’s Beethoven?
Is Open Phil harboring an immense pool of artistic talent and will EA see a renaissance in design?
The flower was licensed from this site.
The designer saw and appreciated this comment, but asked not to be named on the Forum.
Meta comment [1]- Ok, well. I downvoted my own comment above, because it rose to the top, above a comment that I think is more substantive.
I don’t have much more upvoting/downvoting power, so please stop upvoting my comment, or at least upvote the aaronb50 comment[2].
Yes ,this comment you are reading is insipid, but it’s still better than wobbly arguing over neartermism/longtermism, instead of doing the thing.
Probably upvotes should be by merit, not by relative position, so the ideas in this comment might be wrong in general.
Current theme: default
Less Wrong (text)
Less Wrong (link)
Arrow keys: Next/previous image
Escape or click: Hide zoomed image
Space bar: Reset image size & position
Scroll to zoom in/out
(When zoomed in, drag to pan; double-click to close)
Keys shown in yellow (e.g., ]) are accesskeys, and require a browser-specific modifier key (or keys).
]
Keys shown in grey (e.g., ?) do not require any modifier keys.
?
Esc
h
f
a
m
v
c
r
q
t
u
o
,
.
/
s
n
e
;
Enter
[
\
k
i
l
=
-
0
′
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
→
↓
←
↑
Space
x
z
`
g
So, are we going to talk about the awesome aesthetic design, like the five dimensional meta flower?
Can you write about the design choices and who did this work?
Is Aaron Gertler secretly this generation’s Beethoven?
Is Open Phil harboring an immense pool of artistic talent and will EA see a renaissance in design?
The flower was licensed from this site.
The designer saw and appreciated this comment, but asked not to be named on the Forum.
Meta comment [1]- Ok, well. I downvoted my own comment above, because it rose to the top, above a comment that I think is more substantive.
I don’t have much more upvoting/downvoting power, so please stop upvoting my comment, or at least upvote the aaronb50 comment[2].
Yes ,this comment you are reading is insipid, but it’s still better than wobbly arguing over neartermism/longtermism, instead of doing the thing.
Probably upvotes should be by merit, not by relative position, so the ideas in this comment might be wrong in general.