The point in 4. 2 re: transitivity is what Larry Temkin weakens in his work, and is a point I make in my own blog essay on this. Temkin makes arguments that transitivity might not hold. This would partially strengthen your arguments. (Potentially you can’t make vlid additive aggregation arguments). Kudos to writing all of this up.
The point in 4. 2 re: transitivity is what Larry Temkin weakens in his work, and is a point I make in my own blog essay on this. Temkin makes arguments that transitivity might not hold. This would partially strengthen your arguments. (Potentially you can’t make vlid additive aggregation arguments). Kudos to writing all of this up.